Provocative

Not just a provocative title, but a provocative premise as well.

Thought-provoking

Not only makes you think but also wonder about America's future.

Insightful

Chocked full of hard truths about America's past, present, and future.

About The Book

What does it have to offer the reader?

Does Not Pander

With no desire to be labeled as just another hyperpartisan provocateur pandering to either a left or right-leaning American readership, this book was written in such a way as to allow the reader to interpret for themselves whether or not the melting pot experiment was a failure or a success. And if the reader happens to be an American citizen living inside the experiment, to also decide for themselves whether or not the time has come to abandon the experiment en masse (migration), or if the experiment is by no means over and worthy of the continuation of the fight to make it the more perfect union that it has the potential to become.

Impeccably Sourced

Written in an age when hard truths are dismissed as mere conjecture and mere conjecture is pandered as hard truth, this book goes above and beyond in a painstaking effort to cite hundreds of historical sources in order to support its premise. This was not only to appease legitimate "fact-checkers," but also those who would criticize the book's premise as being divisive, which is one of the reasons why the book is not afraid of being accused of going overboard with extensively researched citations, definitions, and word etymology of even the most common and rudimentary terms in their antiquated, antebellum, or modern-day usage.

Raising the Bar

The book also acknowledges that in this modern age, writers must be hypervigilant in anticipation of criticism from opponents who would seek to label the book as the defamatory and derogatory "fake news," which has become the new normal in America. This is not because the book is flawed, but because the ideology of its detractors is flawed. Meaning that even though the bars of social and political civility and decorum have been lowered in America, the standards for what constitutes legitimate criticism of the melting pot experiment have nonetheless been raised.

About The Publisher

The Cartelyou & DeSoto Imprint

Truly Independent

Other independent publishers have billed themselves as being different, polar opposites rejecting the status quo in the publishing industry but then try to pigeonhole authors into what they or analytics say will sell the most copies. Cartelyou & DeSoto rejects this business model.

Disruptors

Cartelyou & DeSoto is not a disruptor because it is attempting to reinvent the wheel or build a better mousetrap. Neither is it like other disruptors who merely use "disruption" as a segue into the traditional business model then fall in-line with tradition.

Queries

One author and title down, many more authors and titles to go. Authors interested in aligning their passion and vision with our imprint may contact us at inquiry@cartelyoudesoto.com

Agent Not Required

Traditional publishing via "The Big 5" publishers or their subsidiaries is unfortunately for new authors merely a game of chance and is essentially a closed system only allowing a few authentically "first time" authors into the system each year who must bring with them an agent, pedigree, an existing brand or following, or a notable celebrity endorsement. Cartelyou & DeSoto rejects this business model.

Art versus analytics

Cartelyou and DeSoto is not the imprint for authors who embrace idealism, disruption, and non-traditional or independent publishing merely because they could not gain access to the rarefied air of a traditional publishing deal. This imprint represents writing as art first and foremost. Branding, entertainment value, and bestseller lists, are merely byproducts. Because in the words of one musicologist "just because it's popular does not mean it's good."

It's a fight vs. flight question, Should a citizen abandon the experiment or stay and fight?

Read The Book!

Buy on B & N Buy on Amazon

This Is Historical Truth Not Opinion

Literally hundreds of citations!

Question

Did America's "Founders" and even Mr. Lincoln himself think the melting pot would survive as long as it has? This in light of both its very turbulent colonial and modern history.

Author Bio

Terry Deadrick-Leonard

The author's bio is irrelevant in this case because this endeavor was never about the author. It was and will always be about America–the melting pot experiment....This book was never the author's personal story. It was, and will always be, America's story.

Some individuals just like hearing themselves talk, or in the case of book authors, get a thrill from seeing their thoughts and ideas on the written page. Other individuals are either attempting to build a brand, as is the case for so many "newish" or first time authors, or else the goal is to increase awareness of an existing brand, as it is for authors who have already built a brand as professional athletes, professional entertainers, or those exploiting their 15-minutes of fame received because of a sudden (tragedy or feel good) unexpected life event.

It has been said that there is a difference between artists and entertainers even though the terms are often used interchangeably regarding singers, musicians, and actors, whereby many mere entertainers like to refer to themselves as artists. This book, on the other hand, is neither art nor entertainment. Neither is it mere American History. If anything, it most closely resembles a "legal" testimony. No, not like presenting a case before the United Nations Assembly against America for crimes against its people of color. No, neither is it like a case that could be laid out before the United States Supreme Court regarding reparations for said crimes against America's people of color. No, it is not a representation of a prosecutorial case or even a civil rights lawsuit.

It is, however, not totally unlike the Mark 6:11 "shake the dust from your feet if the people reject your testimony" (author's paraphrase) New Testament imagery. As such, the testimony is not even the author's but is America's self-incriminating (nemo tenetur) testimony through its own well-documented history.

So, if the book was able to present a condensed summary of irrefutable facts about the melting pot experiment, to ultimately be judged by a jury of its peers (its citizens), as to whether it has met its demise or is alive and well, then the book can be considered a success. However, if the book was successful at creating a heightened awareness of the name of its author, then it was a complete and utter failure.

So how does a publisher promote, sell, and convey the most valuable ideas of a book such as this? Allow the author to provide lectures. Send lecture requests directly to the author's email address (preferred method) deadrick-leonard@torontomail.com or use this site's lecture contact form (below)

Request Author Lecture

* You will not receive unsolicited emails.

Free Desk Copy

Single copy to professors who plan to use the book as a supplement, an optional reading, or companion to an existing required textbook.

* You will not receive unsolicited emails.

Subject to Approval

deskcopy@cartelyoudesoto.com

Verification

Verifiable U.S. and Canada college or university addresses

Shipping

No U.S. territories, P.O. Boxes, international, APO, or FPO addresses