Not just a provocative title, but a provocative premise as well.
Not only makes you think but also wonder about America's future.
Chocked full of hard truths about America's past, present, and future.
What does it have to offer the reader?
With no desire to be labeled as just another hyperpartisan provocateur pandering to either a left or right-leaning American readership, this book was written in such a way as to allow the reader to interpret for themselves whether or not the melting pot experiment was a failure or a success. And if the reader happens to be an American citizen living inside the experiment, to also decide for themselves whether or not the time has come to abandon the experiment en masse (migration), or if the experiment is by no means over and worthy of the continuation of the fight to make it the more perfect union that it has the potential to become.
Written in an age when hard truths are dismissed as mere conjecture and mere conjecture is pandered as hard truth, this book goes above and beyond in a painstaking effort to cite hundreds of historical sources in order to support its premise. This was not only to appease legitimate "fact-checkers," but also those who would criticize the book's premise as being divisive, which is one of the reasons why the book is not afraid of being accused of going overboard with extensively researched citations, definitions, and word etymology of even the most common and rudimentary terms in their antiquated, antebellum, or modern-day usage.
The book also acknowledges that in this modern age, writers must be hypervigilant in anticipation of criticism from opponents who would seek to label the book as the defamatory and derogatory "fake news," which has become the new normal in America. This is not because the book is flawed, but because the ideology of its detractors is flawed. Meaning that even though the bars of social and political civility and decorum have been lowered in America, the standards for what constitutes legitimate criticism of the melting pot experiment have nonetheless been raised.
The Cartelyou & DeSoto Imprint
Other independent publishers have billed themselves as being different, polar opposites rejecting the status quo in the publishing industry but then try to pigeonhole authors into what they or analytics say will sell the most copies. Cartelyou & DeSoto rejects this business model.
Cartelyou & DeSoto is not a disruptor because it is attempting to reinvent the wheel or build a better mousetrap. Neither is it like other disruptors who merely use "disruption" as a segue into the traditional business model then fall in-line with tradition.
One author and title down, many more authors and titles to go. Authors interested in aligning their passion and vision with our imprint may contact us at inquiry@cartelyoudesoto.com
Traditional publishing via "The Big 5" publishers or their subsidiaries is unfortunately for new authors merely a game of chance and is essentially a closed system only allowing a few authentically "first time" authors into the system each year who must bring with them an agent, pedigree, an existing brand or following, or a notable celebrity endorsement. Cartelyou & DeSoto rejects this business model.
Cartelyou and DeSoto is not the imprint for authors who embrace idealism, disruption, and non-traditional or independent publishing merely because they could not gain access to the rarefied air of a traditional publishing deal. This imprint represents writing as art first and foremost. Branding, entertainment value, and bestseller lists, are merely byproducts. Because in the words of one musicologist "just because it's popular does not mean it's good."
Literally hundreds of citations!
Did America's "Founders" and even Mr. Lincoln himself think the melting pot would survive as long as it has? This in light of both its very turbulent colonial and modern history.